You may want to refer to the post "Common Poetic Techniques and Terms."
Scansion
Line 1: / u u / u / u / u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
Line 2: u u / u u / u / u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 4 stresses
Line 3: / u u / u / u / u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
Line 4: u / u / u / u / u / (enjambment) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
Line 5: / / u / u / u / u / (enjambment) = 10 syllables with 6 stresses
Line 6: / u u / u / u / u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
Line 7: u / u / u / u / u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
Line 8: u / u / / u u / u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
Line 9: / u u / u / u / u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
Line 10: / u u / u / u / u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
Line 11: u / u / u / u / u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
Line 12: / u u / u / u / u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
Line 13: u / u / u / u / u / (enjambment) = 10 syllables with 5
stresses
Line 14: u / u / u / u / u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
Line 15: / u u / u / u / u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
Line 16: u / u / u / u / u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
Line 17: / u / / u / u u u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
Line 18: / / u / u / u / u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 6 stresses
Line 19: / u u / u / u / u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
Prevailing meter: iambic pentameter
Primary variation on dominant foot: trochee
Form: villanelle
Rhyme scheme: a1ba2 // aba1 // aba2 // aba1 // aba2 // aba1a2
Poetic Techniques
Line 1: "way" and "play" = internal rhyme
"little" = meiosis
"game" = metaphor = life
Line 2: metaphor = hide-and-seek
Line 3: "will" = pun = "desire" or "try to do"
"the same" = meiosis = metaphor = in death
Line 4: "classical physique" = allusion to Greek art = metaphor =
statuesque
Line 5: "courting" = pun = "seek affections of" (the personification
of "lust" and "envy") or "to seek to achieve"
Line 6: refrain
Line 7: "fragile" and "fame" = alliteration
"fame" = metaphor = an object
Line 8: "drop out" = meiosis = die
Line 9: "what" and "will" = alliteration
refrain
Line 10: "world" = synecdoche = humanity
"world to shame" = adynation
Line 11: "Rejoicing" = irony
"flesh" = synecdoche = person
"flesh is mortified" = personification = flesh experiences
shame
Line 12: refrain
Line 13: "contrition," "meant," "tame" = consonance
"tame" = pun = "to bring under control" or "to reduce
from a wild state" (Fear is a primitive emotion.)
Line 14: "caught" = irony = God is omniscient.
"caught and tried" = metaphor = the day of judgment
Line 15: refrain
Line 16: extension of metaphor "game" in lines one, six and twelve
metaphor = nature
Line 17: "universally denied" = irony
Line 18: refrain
Line 19: refrain
Summary and Interpretation
Anthony Hecht's Flight Among the Tombs: Poems (1996) is reminiscent of William Blake's Songs of Innocence and of Experience (1794). Blake's collection contains illuminative relief etches that have either a polyphonic, often ironic, or a symphonic relationship with the text. Leonard Baskin's woodcuts of the Grim Reaper personify death as a skeleton in a cloak. The Grim Reaper is the speaker in "All Out." In the woodcut that precedes the poem, he is without his distinctive scythe, which the text supersedes. "All Out" is both a satire--Death ridicules human tendencies with regard to vanity, lust, envy, fame, pride, shame and fear--and a contrapuntal response to Blake's idyllic world.
Similar to the poems in Songs, "All Out" is singsongy, attributable to the refrains and to its primarily masculine, regular rhyme. The first and third lines of the first stanza appear four times throughout the poem; the speech sound am (long a) is repeated thirteen times, and the speech sound id (long i) is repeated six times; the five tercets have an aba rhyme scheme, and the quatrain has an abaa rhyme scheme. The poem's lyricism also is attributable to its recurrent meter (pentameter) and predominant foot (iamb). But Hecht varies the rhythm for effect. For example, "While I count up to ten, the others hide," (2) consists of two anapests and two iambs. The anapaests precede the iambs; hence, Death quickly counts while the players slowly hide. The trochee "claiming" (8) is between four iambs, suggesting it may be a faithless declaration. "Of penance and contrition" (13) consists of three successive unstressed syllables, which reflect the quiet atmosphere of churches. Finally, the spondee "This is" (18) aggressively reinforces Death's assertion.
Whereas most lyric poems thematically focus on loss, the formal properties of Hecht's villanelle address the idea of loss directly. The refrains, rhymes, recurrent meter, and predominant foot create a circular argument befitting the theme: it is inevitable we will die. Our inability to progress beyond the limitations established by Death is underscored with numerous caesuras (eleven) and end-stops (sixteen).
Although the topic is serious, the poem's tone is comic, achieved through such techniques as meiosis, pun and irony. Meiosis--"little" (1)--deliberately represents something--life--as less important than it actually is. Death's play on words sustains the poem's complexity. For example, according to Death those who are vain seek the affections of lustful and envious people; furthermore, vanity is a manifestation of lust and envy. Ironic statements such as "Rejoicing when their flesh is mortified" (11) and the universal denial of death also have a comic effect.
In contrast to Blake's appealingly childlike Songs, "All Out" offers a bleak view of human experience. Hecht ensnares his readers with numerous poetic techniques. Death is ultimately victorious both psychologically and physically. His hold is ritualistic, associated with the very form of the poem. Our fall from grace is a descent into time, mortality. Because we cannot escape, we should sing as often as we can.
This blog is for students, teachers, professionals--any person who wants to learn more about academic writing, literary criticism, creative writing, and business communication.
Thursday, January 10, 2013
Thursday, July 19, 2012
Greek Town: Thornton Wilder's Our Town
Thornton Wilder’s tragedy, Our Town, was
unique at the time of its initial performance in 1938 because the techniques he
had incorporated into the play were seemingly experimental: minor scenery, some
furniture, few props.1 Action that
normally would require the use of props—preparing breakfast, for example—is mimed
by the players. Wilder’s approach was
risky, considering many theatrical productions in the 1930’s focused on
costumes, sets and music—that is, were lavish performances. The
Great Waltz (1934) had 180 performers who wore a total of 500
costumes. An innovative hydraulic system
moved the massive sets, and a 53-piece orchestra closed the spectacle with
Strauss’ The Blue Danube. Billy Rose’s $340,000 budget for Jumbo (1935) prevented the production
from being profitable. Hellzapoppin'
(1938) was similar to a circus—entertaining the audience via comedians,
impersonators, singers, dancers, a magician, musicians, dwarfs, clowns, and
pigeons.
Wilder’s
techniques suggest that his sentiments about the state of theater in the 1930’s
were similar to Antonin Artaud’s in The Theater and Its Double:
An idea of the theater has been lost.
[…] At the point of
deterioration which our sensibility has reached, it is certain that
we need above all a theater that wakens us up: nerves and heart.
[…] In the anguished, catastrophic period we live in, we feel an
urgent need for a theater which events do not exceed, whose
resonance is deep within us, dominating the instability of the
times.
deterioration which our sensibility has reached, it is certain that
we need above all a theater that wakens us up: nerves and heart.
[…] In the anguished, catastrophic period we live in, we feel an
urgent need for a theater which events do not exceed, whose
resonance is deep within us, dominating the instability of the
times.
Our long habit of seeking diversion
has made us forget the idea
of a serious theater, which, overturning all our preconceptions,
inspires us with the fiery magnetism of its images and acts upon
us like a spiritual therapeutics whose touch can never be
forgotten.2
of a serious theater, which, overturning all our preconceptions,
inspires us with the fiery magnetism of its images and acts upon
us like a spiritual therapeutics whose touch can never be
forgotten.2
The
therapeutic value of theater is not a new concept. In Poetics
(350 B.C.E.), Aristotle predicates his idea of tragedy on the social benefits
of poetry, the tragic effect being analogous to the treatment of emotions. “A tragedy, then, is the imitation of an
action that is serious and also, as having magnitude, complete in itself; in
language with pleasurable accessories, each kind brought in separately in the
parts of the work; in a dramatic, not in a narrative form; with incidents arousing
pity and fear, wherewith to accomplish its catharsis of such emotions” (6.1449b.24).3 Through the influence of dramatic action on
the spectator’s imagination, according to
Aristotle, the morbidity that besets him/her would intensify to the point of
crisis and then abate by way of an emotional outburst that might include
tears. The spectator would leave the
theater mentally healthy, purged of his/her anxieties.
The
tragic plot is designed to affect an audience, and to be properly effective,
the action needs to be of appropriate magnitude. In Poetics
Aristotle suggests a simple precept: “Plot must be of some length, but of a
length to be taken in by the memory” (7.1451a.5). With respect to the duration of the incidents
represented on the stage, however, the suggestion is more precise. “Tragedy,” Aristotle states, “endeavours to
keep as far as possible within a single circuit of the sun, or something near that”
(5.1449b.14). Aristotle does
not extensively discuss the supposed unity of time. It seems the restriction of the action to the
events in a single day had more to do with the concentration of the action than
with doubts about the ability of the audience to accord the passage of time on
the stage with the passage of time in the auditorium. Aristotle does not require the imitation of
action to be exact, nor did the Greek poets have any such idea. It was the sixteenth-century humanists, such
as the critic Lodovico Castelvetro, who invented the unities.
For
example, Aeschylus’ Agamemnon (458
B.C.E.) takes place over an indefinite period of time. The watchman sees the beacon on the
mountaintop presumably soon after the sack of Troy, and it would take several
days for Agamemnon’s ship to cross the Aegean, but it is convenient to have the
interval covered by a choral song that lasts minutes. Likewise, the action of Our Town spans longer than a single day (1901 – 1913), including
temporal shifts forward and backward.
But one easily could argue that the action of Our Town occurs in one day; the drama begins “just before dawn” (4)
and ends at “night” (112).
Aristotle
mentions nothing in the Poetics about
the unity of place. Greek theater in the
fifth century was not well adapted to facilitate frequent changes of scene, but
it is likely that, by the time of Sophocles (496 – 406 B.C.E.), painted screens
oriented the audience. The existent tragedies
do not require a multiplicity of scenes, and when there is a scenic change, little
effort is necessary to shift the action from place to place. The seventeenth-century French poets adopted
unity of place to enhance the difficulty of their art. Although they developed a style of classical
drama that was successful—Pierre Corneille’s Le Cid (1636), for example—it was divergent from the style of Greek
tragedy. Wilder adheres to unity of
place in Our Town: “The entire play
takes place in Grover’s Corners, New Hampshire” (2).
Aeschylus’
Troy existed, but Wilder’s Grover’s Corners is fictional: is that consequential?
No, according to Aristotle, because art
is mimetic. “Tragedy is essentially an
imitation not of persons but of action and life, of happiness and misery. All human happiness or misery takes the form
of action; the end for which we live is a certain kind of activity, not a
quality” (6.1450a.16). Tragedy
imitates nature and edifies to the extent that it imitates life, life’s essential
and universal essence. Tragedy is the
imitation of an action, a phenomenon. Unlike
history, it represents not what is said to have occurred, but what might or
should have happened in order to provoke pity and fear, which is the intent of
tragedy.
The
tragic effect was achieved by limiting the scope of the action. Aristotle defines unity of action in terms of
the relation of a whole to its parts: “Now a whole is that which has beginning,
middle, and end” (7.1450b.26). His formulation involves the principle of
logical sequence which the Poetics affirms
throughout as essential to a well-constructed plot. Moreover, a series of incidents
firmly linked in the order of cause and consequence would not only have unity,
but would prevent the inclusion of extraneous incidents:
The truth is that, just as in the other imitative arts one imitation
is always of one thing, so in poetry the story, as an imitation of
action, must represent one action, a complete whole, with its
several incidents so closely connected that the transposal or
withdrawal of any one of them will disjoin and dislocate the
whole. For that which makes no perceptible difference by its
presence or absence is no real part of the whole. (8.1451a.30)
is always of one thing, so in poetry the story, as an imitation of
action, must represent one action, a complete whole, with its
several incidents so closely connected that the transposal or
withdrawal of any one of them will disjoin and dislocate the
whole. For that which makes no perceptible difference by its
presence or absence is no real part of the whole. (8.1451a.30)
Aristotle’s
principle of composition has been quoted as often as it has been violated. An adherence to his precept would result in a
narrative structure that is rare, but not impossible, to find. The three-act structure of Our Town (“Daily Life,” “Love and
Marriage,” “Death”) unifies the action, and Our
Town focuses on one story with no subplots to complicate things.
The
focus of Greek tragedy was more extensive than what is in the current canon; Aristotle
mentions many tragedies of which there are no vestiges. Of the plays that have been preserved, those
that deal with domestic horrors appear to have been especially effective. According to Aristotle, “Though the poets
began by accepting any tragic story that came to hand, in these days the finest
tragedies are always on the story of some few houses, on that of Alcmeon,
Oedipus, Orestes, Meleager, Thyestes, Telephus, or any others that may have
been involved, as either agents or sufferers, in some deed of horror” (13.1453a.19). The connections among relatives, friends and
associates were important in ancient Greece and Rome, and the action in Aeschylus’
Agamemnon certainly aroused deep
emotions in fifth-century spectators.
Since Shakespeare, however, we have been tending to think of the tragic
element in terms of the reluctant hero’s inner conflict and the social
pressures that determine his/her behavior.
Wilder
shifts the focus back to domestic issues.
The characters frequently exhibit their love toward each other. In the first act, familial love and
friendship predominate. Evening falls on
Grover’s Corners, and the Congregational Church’s choir, under the direction of
Simon Stimson, begins to rehearse.
George and Emily discuss algebra.
Dr. Gibbs and George speak about responsibilities and allowances. Mrs. Soames and Mrs. Webb gossip about Simon
Stimson’s alcoholism. Mrs. Gibbs and Dr.
Gibbs talk and walk with their arms linked.
The constable makes his rounds to ensure all is well. Mr. Webb talks to his daughter, Emily, who is
enjoying the moonlight at her bedroom window. And the Stage Manager calls an end to a
typical day in Grover’s Corners. In the
second act, romantic love blossoms into marriage after George and Emily
overcome their doubts and fears. In the
third act, selfless, spiritual love is shown.
George does not utter a word, but when he throws himself onto Emily’s
grave, his deed speaks loudly.
In
Greek tragedy, when one expects the chorus to utter wisdom, it usually provides
formal precepts and trite maxims—chiding excess, counseling moderation, and
brooding on the folly of pride and the dangers of hubris. The chorus, as an actor in the tragedy, is seldom
in a position to generalize
philosophically on the significance of the action. To infer the meaning of a tragedy—assuming it
has a meaning—one must look, not at what is said, but to what is done. Thus, one discovers that tragedy is seldom
informative. Often it is ambiguous.
The
Stage Manager in Our Town is similar
to the chorus in Agamemnon. Aeschylus’ chorus is aware of both the
principals and the spectators. At times
it separates the audience from the action to concentrate attention on itself,
and occasionally the chorus unites the two dramatically and emotionally. It is a participant in the action, an actor,
and it is a mirror, something that brings into proper proportion the action. Aristotle states that “The Chorus too should
be regarded as one of the actors; it should be an integral part of the whole,
and take a share in the action” (18.1456a.25). Wilder’s Stage Manager is a neutral
character, an actor both inside and outside the play. He addresses the audience on the present, the
past, and the future. Temporal limits
bind him, yet the Stage Manager is both beyond and outside time. He comments on the action and tells the audience
about events that occur offstage. In Act
II the Stage Manager informs the audience that the title of the act is “Love
and Marriage.” George attempts to see
Emily, but Mrs. Webb does not allow him to see his bride. The Stage Manager interrupts to present a
scene from the past, the time when George and Emily became aware of their love
for each other. The Stage Manager asks
Dr. and Mrs. Gibbs to explain to the audience how the parents reacted to the
engagement. While the actors arrange
chairs to be pews for the wedding scene, the Stage Manager talks to the
audience about the importance of marriage.
The wedding begins with the Stage Manager as the clergyman.
Our Town begins at dawn
with the birth of twins in a nearby town and ends at night with the death of
Emily Webb Gibbs in childbirth. As one
life ends, another begins. Throughout
the play the Stage Manager directs the audience’s attention to the repetition
of the cycle of life. In his opening
monologue, he announces that the names on the tombstones in the graveyard are
the “same names as are around here now” (6).
At the beginning of Act II, the Stage Manager affirms that the sun has
“come up over a thousand times” (47).
And in the third act, he mentions both: “lots of sun and moon and stars”
and “Over there—are the old stones” (86).
Some
critics consider Thornton Wilder a religious writer and Our Town a religious play.
But, excepting the Congregational Church and the wedding scene, there is
nothing explicit about God or heaven.
The Stage Manager contemplates the word eternal at the beginning of Act III:
Now there are some things we all know, but we don’t take’m out
and look at’m very often. We all know that something is
eternal. And it ain’t houses and it ain’t names, and it ain’t earth,
and it ain’t even the stars … everybody knows in their bones
that something is eternal, and that something has to do with
human beings. All the greatest people ever lived have been
telling us that for five thousand years and yet you’d be surprised
how people are always losing hold of it. There’s something was
down deep that’s eternal about every human being. (87 – 88)
and look at’m very often. We all know that something is
eternal. And it ain’t houses and it ain’t names, and it ain’t earth,
and it ain’t even the stars … everybody knows in their bones
that something is eternal, and that something has to do with
human beings. All the greatest people ever lived have been
telling us that for five thousand years and yet you’d be surprised
how people are always losing hold of it. There’s something was
down deep that’s eternal about every human being. (87 – 88)
Aristotle
does not discuss, nor did he need to discuss, in the Poetics the religious or the moral or the political objectives of
the poet/dramatist. Aristotle’s theater
is not a forum for the exchange of ideas.
A tragedy is neither an allegory nor an exemplum nor a vehicle for the
expression of opinions. From Aristotle’s standpoint tragedy is
designed to move, not to teach. Similar
to Agamemnon, Our Town concludes with no resolution. The moral issue is left open.
Grover’s
Corners is ruled by laws and customs that the inhabitants heed, but it is
laughable to conclude that the imitation of banality was Wilder’s objective. The Stage Manager is assiduous in his effort
to discern patterns, but the play truly defies rationalization, and the Stage
Manager suggests that the meaning is explicable only in regard to the eternal
thing which resides in each of us. God
only knows what that is.
_______________________________________________________
1Thornton Wilder, Our Town (New York: Perennial-Harper,
2003).
2Antonin Artaud, The Theater and Its Double, trans. by Mary
Caroline Richards (New York: Evergreen-Grove Press, 1958) 84 – 85.
3Aristotle, On Poetics, trans. by Ingram Bywater, in
Great Books of the Western World:
Aristotle II, Vol. 9 (Chicago: Encylcopædia Britannica, 1952) 681 –
699.
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Brief Analysis of American Primitive
Lineation, repetition and tropes are the effective constituents of the poems in American Primitive.* Mary Oliver, using the aforementioned poetic techniques, transforms otherwise commonplace free verse into lyrical and imagistic elegies. For example, "The Sea" begins with the rhythmic lines, "Stroke by / stroke my / body remembers that life and cries for / the lost parts of itself" (1 - 4). Anaphora counters the enjambment between the first and second lines with the result that the reader/listener actually feels as though he/she is swimming. The pace quickens through the third line and into the fourth line--as the speaker is remembering--until the reader/listener encounters an end-stop, a hyphen. The pace slackens again when the reader/listener encounters a comma separating a spondee: "fins, gills" (5).
Sometimes Oliver repeats individual words and phrases within lines. "Something" begins with alliteration: "Somebody skulking the yard / stumbles against a stone, it stutters / across the dark boards of the night / and we know. We know" (1 - 4). The internal repetition of the phrase "we know" echoes the sound of the stone. More often, however, Oliver uses anaphora to create rhythm and to make her endings powerful. In "Vultures" the repetition of infinitives in three successive lines (6 - 8) establishes a rhythm that she breaks with the multisyllabic word "resurrection" (9). The colon stresses the word's importance. The phrase "no one" appears internally three times--in lines 9, 13 and 20--as well as the word "them"--in lines 28, 30 and 31--creating tension. Oliver employs anaphora near the end of the poem:
however wise the doctrine,
however magnificent the cycles,
however ultimately sweet
the huddle of death to fuel
those powerful wings. (32 - 36)
Oliver is restating the ideas in lines six through nine, which makes the poem's structure correlate with its theme.
Oliver portrays the notion of resurrection in "Vultures" both sonically and imagistically. Furthermore, throughout the collection, philosophical abstractions become concrete by way of tropes. The mundane association of love with flowers seems less cliche in "Cold Poem" because she imagistically portrays love as egocentric in the ultimate line, "crushed red flowers" (24). Although Oliver compares lust to flowers in "An Old Whorehouse"--"It would be years before / we'd learn how effortlessly / sin blooms, then softens, / like any bed of flowers" (15 - 18)--she does such in a unique way.
Any poet contemplating free verse as a means of expression needs to study Oliver's techniques. She concretely and uniquely depicts abstract concepts. She creates unity via repetition. Her linear breaks simulate motion and control emotion.
_______________________________________________________
*Mary Oliver, American Primitive (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1979).
Sometimes Oliver repeats individual words and phrases within lines. "Something" begins with alliteration: "Somebody skulking the yard / stumbles against a stone, it stutters / across the dark boards of the night / and we know. We know" (1 - 4). The internal repetition of the phrase "we know" echoes the sound of the stone. More often, however, Oliver uses anaphora to create rhythm and to make her endings powerful. In "Vultures" the repetition of infinitives in three successive lines (6 - 8) establishes a rhythm that she breaks with the multisyllabic word "resurrection" (9). The colon stresses the word's importance. The phrase "no one" appears internally three times--in lines 9, 13 and 20--as well as the word "them"--in lines 28, 30 and 31--creating tension. Oliver employs anaphora near the end of the poem:
however wise the doctrine,
however magnificent the cycles,
however ultimately sweet
the huddle of death to fuel
those powerful wings. (32 - 36)
Oliver is restating the ideas in lines six through nine, which makes the poem's structure correlate with its theme.
Oliver portrays the notion of resurrection in "Vultures" both sonically and imagistically. Furthermore, throughout the collection, philosophical abstractions become concrete by way of tropes. The mundane association of love with flowers seems less cliche in "Cold Poem" because she imagistically portrays love as egocentric in the ultimate line, "crushed red flowers" (24). Although Oliver compares lust to flowers in "An Old Whorehouse"--"It would be years before / we'd learn how effortlessly / sin blooms, then softens, / like any bed of flowers" (15 - 18)--she does such in a unique way.
Any poet contemplating free verse as a means of expression needs to study Oliver's techniques. She concretely and uniquely depicts abstract concepts. She creates unity via repetition. Her linear breaks simulate motion and control emotion.
_______________________________________________________
*Mary Oliver, American Primitive (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1979).
Labels:
American Primitive,
literary criticism,
Oliver
Monday, September 5, 2011
Example of an Effective Memo
I attached the following memo, a proposal, to an email I sent to my superiors and peers at the Episcopal Church of the Advent. A proposal is a complex argument, a combination of different types of arguments: definitional, categorical, evaluative and/or causal. (For more information on argumentation, please refer to "Toulmin's Scheme for Argumentation" and "The Components of an Academic Argument.") The introductory paragraph is a summary of the content. In the succedent section, "Current System," I define the problem. I respectively describe some consequences and evaluate some options in the next two sections. I close the memo with a recommendation and an alternative. To limit the length of the memo, I attached appendices of details for those who might have needed more information.
Rose Cornelson Montgomery Library
Date: 31 August 2011
To: Ned Morris, Ann Harken, Chris Lynn
From: Stephen Tulloh
Subject: Modernizing the Library
The library must become more efficient--that is, easier to manage and easier to investigate--lest it return to a patronless storage area that it had come to be until a couple of weeks ago. We have an extensive collection of religious information that could be useful to parishioners, students at local colleges, and patrons of the public library if only they knew more about our holdings. An electronic management system, similar to the system by which the public library operates, will allow volunteers to direct the use of the library's information more effectively and will make the library's holdings more searchable, opening the library to more people. If we shift to an electronic management system, it would differ from the public library's system in two major ways. Our system would be free, and it would be adaptable.
Current System
There are three ways a patron can investigate the library's holdings, and each requires the patron to be in Satterlee Hall. He/she can browse the shelves, leaf through the card catalog, or peruse a printout. One problem is the library may not have what the person wants or needs, but he/she put forth effort to come to the library. Although leafing through the card catalog is quicker than browsing the shelves, it is inconvenient because the cabinet occupies a corner of the library workroom, a space that accommodates one person. To search for items via subject, one must stoop or squat. Another problem is the organization of the printout, via call numbers, which is beneficial to librarians, not patrons.
If a patron wants to borrow an item, he/she must complete a series of tasks to check out the item. First, the patron must complete a registration card. Second, he/she must file it. Third, the patron must sign the check-out card and write the date on it. Fourth, he/she must file that card.
That process is not difficult. Cataloging all the donations since 2005, however, will be difficult. The database, if it remains, has not been updated for six years. The library received hundreds of donations throughout that period. If we do not shift to an electronic management system, volunteers will need--for each item--to determine the call number, to type three similar cards for the catalog, to enter the information into the database, and to type a check-out card. Again, volunteers will need to do all the aforementioned for each item.
Modernizing the Library 2 31 August 2011
New System
Shifting to an electronic management system will not consume more time than maintaining the current system. Such systems generate call numbers via International Standard Book Numbers (ISBN's), and they eliminate redundant tasks, such as typing three similar cards for a catalog. They also produce all the relevant information a patron needs to determine whether an item meets his/her needs. Furthermore, patrons can search for an item via author, title or subject, and they can do such remotely.
Libraries have been shifting to electronic management systems because the systems are more efficient. However, with respect to public and academic libraries, those systems are expensive to install and maintain. For libraries with significantly fewer holdings, there are cost-effective choices, one being open-source, integrative software.
Open-source software is available to the public for free. The developers reason that those who use the source codes will modify them, ensuring the applications will be more useful and errorless than compiled applications, which tend to become outmoded sooner. (For more information about open-source and compiled software, please refer to Appendix A). Because users customize the codes, open-source software continuously evolves, and there are networks of users that provide technical support.
Our Options
There are six reputable providers of open-source, integrative library management software. At one end of the range is Liblime Koha, which is appropriate for public and academic libraries. It charges for a warranty and technical support. Georgia's public library system developed and maintains Evergreen, but it, like SOPAC2, requires Apache, an internet service provider, and MySQL, open-source database software, both with which I am not familiar. At the other end of the range is Library Thing, a community for individuals who want to catalog their books online. In the middle of the range are OpenBiblio and BiblioteQ. Both are for midsize libraries, but OpenBiblio lacks refinement.
My Recommendation
Windows supports BiblioteQ, and the code is in a language (C++) I understand. The application will simplify the management of the library and will make it more serviceable. Volunteers will be able to catalog books, periodicals, audiotapes, compact disks, videotapes, and digital versatile disks, and they will be able to do such without comprehensive knowledge of Dewey Decimal Classification, for the software will generate control, call and class numbers via ISBN's. Thus, the classification of items will be less subjective. The application also will produce images of covers by way of Amazon and will retrieve information--title, authors, publishers, et cetera--by way of Z39.50 queries. (For more information about Z39.50, please refer to Appendix B.) Because the software shortens the time to catalog items, volunteers will be able to focus on other administrative tasks--such as creating accounts; updating patrons' information; generating lists of overdue, requested and reserved items; and printing and interpreting statistics.
Modernizing the Library 3 31 August 2011
Because BiblioteQ has uniform functionality across various platforms, courtesy of Z39.50, patrons will be able to access the library's holdings remotely. And they will be able to query the library's holdings via author, title or subject. They will be able to request an unavailable item, to reserve an item, or to communicate with a volunteer. Furthermore, they will be able to gather more information through embedded hyperlinks to Amazon, the Library of Congress, or another website.
An Alternative
The library has a compiled application, ResourceMate, that Jaywil Software Development released in 2005. The problem is the version, 2.0 Plus, does not have some of the essential features volunteers will need to manage the library efficiently. For example, if we are unable to locate the database, an army of volunteers will have to spend hundreds of hours creating another catalog of the library's holdings. To reduce the number of volunteers and the amount of time that would require, we need to upgrade from 2.0 Plus to 3.0 Plus, which will cost $129.00. Then, we must upgrade the screen license from 2.0 to 3.0, and that will cost $10.00. To generate information about an item via ISBN's and Z39.50 queries--the most essential features--we must register our version and pay for support, which is $70.00 per year. Finally, to make the library's holdings searchable via the Web, we must pay $149.00. To summarize: we initially will need to pay Jaywil $358, and that does not include taxes, for something we can get at no cost.
The Future
We also will need to pay Jaywil $70.00 every subsequent year for support. On the other hand, with respect to BiblioteQ, volunteers will be able to change the graphics and information on the homepage, to update the software, and to seek help through BiblioteQ's national users' network. An army of volunteers will not need to manage the library; several volunteers will be able to prevent the neglect that has befallen it.
Modernizing the Library 4 31 August 2011
Appendix A: Compiled versus Open-Source Software
Modernizing the Library 5 31 August 2011
Appendix B: What Is Z39.50?
Z39.50 is a standard for information retrieval. It was developed to overcome the problems with searching multiple databases--problems such as knowledge of unique menus, command language, and search procedures. Z39.50 simplifies the search process, making it possible for a searcher to use the interface of the local system to search both our library's holdings as well as other libraries' holdings.
Z39.50 corresponds to the client-server model of computing in which two computers interact in a peer-to-peer relationship with each computer having a specific functional task. The local system is known as the origin, and it performs all the communicative functions relative to a search--that is, sending a query and requesting the return of records. The Z39.50 part of the local system is known as the target, and it interfaces with the database in the remote system--for example, the Library of Congress--and responds to messages from the origin, providing records that correspond to the query.
One of the many advantages of Z39.50 is that the searcher does not need to know the details of the standard. The origin module within the local system is responsible for establishing the connection to the target, formulating the query, interpreting the results, tracking the results, terminating a session, and so forth. Thus, the searcher only needs to know one set of commands to search our library's holdings and other library's holdings.
The Z39.50 method of information retrieval is different from the traditional method, whereby a searcher uses a local terminal to log into a remote system and uses that system's unique menus, command language, and search procedures. The implementation of Z39.50 will eliminate the need for expertise in the use of a large number of dissimilar systems.
Regardless of the platform or software, systems are able to participate in an information retrieval session if both systems support the Z39.50 standard. Our library needs a system that supports the Z39.50 standard so that volunteers and patrons can perform a wide range of tasks.
Rose Cornelson Montgomery Library
Date: 31 August 2011
To: Ned Morris, Ann Harken, Chris Lynn
From: Stephen Tulloh
Subject: Modernizing the Library
The library must become more efficient--that is, easier to manage and easier to investigate--lest it return to a patronless storage area that it had come to be until a couple of weeks ago. We have an extensive collection of religious information that could be useful to parishioners, students at local colleges, and patrons of the public library if only they knew more about our holdings. An electronic management system, similar to the system by which the public library operates, will allow volunteers to direct the use of the library's information more effectively and will make the library's holdings more searchable, opening the library to more people. If we shift to an electronic management system, it would differ from the public library's system in two major ways. Our system would be free, and it would be adaptable.
Current System
There are three ways a patron can investigate the library's holdings, and each requires the patron to be in Satterlee Hall. He/she can browse the shelves, leaf through the card catalog, or peruse a printout. One problem is the library may not have what the person wants or needs, but he/she put forth effort to come to the library. Although leafing through the card catalog is quicker than browsing the shelves, it is inconvenient because the cabinet occupies a corner of the library workroom, a space that accommodates one person. To search for items via subject, one must stoop or squat. Another problem is the organization of the printout, via call numbers, which is beneficial to librarians, not patrons.
If a patron wants to borrow an item, he/she must complete a series of tasks to check out the item. First, the patron must complete a registration card. Second, he/she must file it. Third, the patron must sign the check-out card and write the date on it. Fourth, he/she must file that card.
That process is not difficult. Cataloging all the donations since 2005, however, will be difficult. The database, if it remains, has not been updated for six years. The library received hundreds of donations throughout that period. If we do not shift to an electronic management system, volunteers will need--for each item--to determine the call number, to type three similar cards for the catalog, to enter the information into the database, and to type a check-out card. Again, volunteers will need to do all the aforementioned for each item.
Modernizing the Library 2 31 August 2011
New System
Shifting to an electronic management system will not consume more time than maintaining the current system. Such systems generate call numbers via International Standard Book Numbers (ISBN's), and they eliminate redundant tasks, such as typing three similar cards for a catalog. They also produce all the relevant information a patron needs to determine whether an item meets his/her needs. Furthermore, patrons can search for an item via author, title or subject, and they can do such remotely.
Libraries have been shifting to electronic management systems because the systems are more efficient. However, with respect to public and academic libraries, those systems are expensive to install and maintain. For libraries with significantly fewer holdings, there are cost-effective choices, one being open-source, integrative software.
Open-source software is available to the public for free. The developers reason that those who use the source codes will modify them, ensuring the applications will be more useful and errorless than compiled applications, which tend to become outmoded sooner. (For more information about open-source and compiled software, please refer to Appendix A). Because users customize the codes, open-source software continuously evolves, and there are networks of users that provide technical support.
Our Options
There are six reputable providers of open-source, integrative library management software. At one end of the range is Liblime Koha, which is appropriate for public and academic libraries. It charges for a warranty and technical support. Georgia's public library system developed and maintains Evergreen, but it, like SOPAC2, requires Apache, an internet service provider, and MySQL, open-source database software, both with which I am not familiar. At the other end of the range is Library Thing, a community for individuals who want to catalog their books online. In the middle of the range are OpenBiblio and BiblioteQ. Both are for midsize libraries, but OpenBiblio lacks refinement.
My Recommendation
Windows supports BiblioteQ, and the code is in a language (C++) I understand. The application will simplify the management of the library and will make it more serviceable. Volunteers will be able to catalog books, periodicals, audiotapes, compact disks, videotapes, and digital versatile disks, and they will be able to do such without comprehensive knowledge of Dewey Decimal Classification, for the software will generate control, call and class numbers via ISBN's. Thus, the classification of items will be less subjective. The application also will produce images of covers by way of Amazon and will retrieve information--title, authors, publishers, et cetera--by way of Z39.50 queries. (For more information about Z39.50, please refer to Appendix B.) Because the software shortens the time to catalog items, volunteers will be able to focus on other administrative tasks--such as creating accounts; updating patrons' information; generating lists of overdue, requested and reserved items; and printing and interpreting statistics.
Modernizing the Library 3 31 August 2011
Because BiblioteQ has uniform functionality across various platforms, courtesy of Z39.50, patrons will be able to access the library's holdings remotely. And they will be able to query the library's holdings via author, title or subject. They will be able to request an unavailable item, to reserve an item, or to communicate with a volunteer. Furthermore, they will be able to gather more information through embedded hyperlinks to Amazon, the Library of Congress, or another website.
An Alternative
The library has a compiled application, ResourceMate, that Jaywil Software Development released in 2005. The problem is the version, 2.0 Plus, does not have some of the essential features volunteers will need to manage the library efficiently. For example, if we are unable to locate the database, an army of volunteers will have to spend hundreds of hours creating another catalog of the library's holdings. To reduce the number of volunteers and the amount of time that would require, we need to upgrade from 2.0 Plus to 3.0 Plus, which will cost $129.00. Then, we must upgrade the screen license from 2.0 to 3.0, and that will cost $10.00. To generate information about an item via ISBN's and Z39.50 queries--the most essential features--we must register our version and pay for support, which is $70.00 per year. Finally, to make the library's holdings searchable via the Web, we must pay $149.00. To summarize: we initially will need to pay Jaywil $358, and that does not include taxes, for something we can get at no cost.
The Future
We also will need to pay Jaywil $70.00 every subsequent year for support. On the other hand, with respect to BiblioteQ, volunteers will be able to change the graphics and information on the homepage, to update the software, and to seek help through BiblioteQ's national users' network. An army of volunteers will not need to manage the library; several volunteers will be able to prevent the neglect that has befallen it.
Modernizing the Library 4 31 August 2011
Appendix A: Compiled versus Open-Source Software
If you have bought or downloaded ready-to-run software, then it is likely that software was compiled, run through a compiler that translated and formatted the source (program) code so that your computer could understand it. Few people can modify compiled versions of applications, and fewer can determine the ways developers created the parts of them. Commercial software manufacturers compile their codes to prevent other manufacturers from copying and using them. Compilation also allows manufacturers to control the quality and features of products.
In contrast to compiled software, open-source software includes the source code, for the developer wants the user to modify it, ensuring the usefulness and longevity of the product. The software development industry regards software as open-source if it meets six criteria:
- The license must not exclude other software.
- The software must not interfere with the operation of other software.
- The distribution of the software must be free.
- The software must include the source code.
- Anybody can modify the source code.
- Custom versions can be redistributed.
Modernizing the Library 5 31 August 2011
Appendix B: What Is Z39.50?
Z39.50 is a standard for information retrieval. It was developed to overcome the problems with searching multiple databases--problems such as knowledge of unique menus, command language, and search procedures. Z39.50 simplifies the search process, making it possible for a searcher to use the interface of the local system to search both our library's holdings as well as other libraries' holdings.
Z39.50 corresponds to the client-server model of computing in which two computers interact in a peer-to-peer relationship with each computer having a specific functional task. The local system is known as the origin, and it performs all the communicative functions relative to a search--that is, sending a query and requesting the return of records. The Z39.50 part of the local system is known as the target, and it interfaces with the database in the remote system--for example, the Library of Congress--and responds to messages from the origin, providing records that correspond to the query.
One of the many advantages of Z39.50 is that the searcher does not need to know the details of the standard. The origin module within the local system is responsible for establishing the connection to the target, formulating the query, interpreting the results, tracking the results, terminating a session, and so forth. Thus, the searcher only needs to know one set of commands to search our library's holdings and other library's holdings.
The Z39.50 method of information retrieval is different from the traditional method, whereby a searcher uses a local terminal to log into a remote system and uses that system's unique menus, command language, and search procedures. The implementation of Z39.50 will eliminate the need for expertise in the use of a large number of dissimilar systems.
Regardless of the platform or software, systems are able to participate in an information retrieval session if both systems support the Z39.50 standard. Our library needs a system that supports the Z39.50 standard so that volunteers and patrons can perform a wide range of tasks.
Sunday, August 7, 2011
Memoranda
Whereas letters are for people outside an organization, memoranda (memos) are for people inside an organization. In large organizations, however, in which each division is autonomous, the corporation's culture determines whether people in different divisions send letters or memos to each other.
The formats of letters and memos are dissimilar. The simplified format of letters is somewhat similar to the format of memos, for both do not have a salutation and close and both have a subject line. Audience and format are the only differences between letters and memos. Both means of communication can be complex or simple, long or short, formal or informal.
A distinct part of a memo is the header, which will vary slightly after the first page. Date:, To:, From: and Subject:, respectively, are at the top of the first page and are flush with the left margin. A space separates each item. Before you send the memo, write your initials next to your name to signify that the memo is genuine and that you proofread it.
Currently memos are attached to emails, and recipients print and archive them. Similar to emails, memos need specific, concise and relative subject lines. (For more information on subject lines, please refer to "Electronic Mail.") Because an effective subject line acts as a title and aids in filing and retrieving, the subject lines of the email and the memo must be, if not identical, correlative.
There are no paragraphic indentations in memos. Ensure there is a space between paragraphs and between text and headings. In complex, long and formal memos, headings improve readability, but the first (introductory) paragraph does not require a heading. With respect to any headings, capitalize the first letter of the first, last and all other words except articles (a, an, the), the to in infinitives, prepositions (on, above, to, for, between, beyond, with, et cetera), and coordinating conjunctions (and, or, nor, for, but, yet and so). Headings also need to be in boldface.
There are no spaces between lines of text. With respect to the organization and content of positive, neutral and negative messages, please refer to "Electronic Mail." The following lists of questions highlight the information in that essay.
Positive and Neutral Messages
Subject line
Date
Page number
Subject line Page number Date
Memos are written to introduce or update a policy, to inform of progress or results, or to respond to an event. Some types of memorandum are summaries, evaluations, progress reports, and field studies. The content of memos and reports is similar, but memos are short, no longer than three pages. Documents that are longer than that are reports disguised as memos.
The formats of letters and memos are dissimilar. The simplified format of letters is somewhat similar to the format of memos, for both do not have a salutation and close and both have a subject line. Audience and format are the only differences between letters and memos. Both means of communication can be complex or simple, long or short, formal or informal.
A distinct part of a memo is the header, which will vary slightly after the first page. Date:, To:, From: and Subject:, respectively, are at the top of the first page and are flush with the left margin. A space separates each item. Before you send the memo, write your initials next to your name to signify that the memo is genuine and that you proofread it.
Currently memos are attached to emails, and recipients print and archive them. Similar to emails, memos need specific, concise and relative subject lines. (For more information on subject lines, please refer to "Electronic Mail.") Because an effective subject line acts as a title and aids in filing and retrieving, the subject lines of the email and the memo must be, if not identical, correlative.
There are no paragraphic indentations in memos. Ensure there is a space between paragraphs and between text and headings. In complex, long and formal memos, headings improve readability, but the first (introductory) paragraph does not require a heading. With respect to any headings, capitalize the first letter of the first, last and all other words except articles (a, an, the), the to in infinitives, prepositions (on, above, to, for, between, beyond, with, et cetera), and coordinating conjunctions (and, or, nor, for, but, yet and so). Headings also need to be in boldface.
There are no spaces between lines of text. With respect to the organization and content of positive, neutral and negative messages, please refer to "Electronic Mail." The following lists of questions highlight the information in that essay.
Positive and Neutral Messages
- Is the introductory paragraph a summary of the content, and does it correlate to the structure of the message?
- Are the headings succinct and relative to the information they introduce?
- Are there details about the policy or the project? In other words, does the memo have all the necessary information: places, dates, times, costs, et cetera?
- Are there reader benefits, and are the benefits realistic?
- Is each benefit developed fully? Did you adapt the benefits to the audience, stress the extrinsic and intrinsic advantages, provide grounds (reasons and/or evidence), and create the benfits with a you-attitude?
- Is the conclusion positive?
- Is the subject line specific, concise and relative?
- Is the format correct?
- Is the introductory paragraph a summary of the content, and does it correlate to the structure of the message?
- Is there a description of the problem?
- Is there a description of the events that caused the problem? (You will need to include such only when you are writing a memo to your superiors.)
- Is there an alternative or a compromise that reveals your concerns for the audience? (You will need to include such only when you are writing a memo to your peers and subordinates.)
- Is there a description of the way(s) to solve the problem? (You will need to include such only if you are writing a memo to your superiors.)
- Is the conclusion positive? Did you recommend a solution to your superiors and ask them for action, or did you ask your peers and subordinates for input or action?
- Is the subject line specific, concise and appropriate? (If you are writing a memo to your superiors, the subject line should be a solution. If you are writing a memo to your peers or subordinates, the subject line should be the topic of the message.)
- Is the format correct?
Subject line
Date
Page number
Subject line Page number Date
Memos are written to introduce or update a policy, to inform of progress or results, or to respond to an event. Some types of memorandum are summaries, evaluations, progress reports, and field studies. The content of memos and reports is similar, but memos are short, no longer than three pages. Documents that are longer than that are reports disguised as memos.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)