Showing posts with label scansion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label scansion. Show all posts

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Poetry (a Revisitation): Rhythm

In this essay I discuss ways to create rhythm--specifically via the repetition of consonants and vowels, the use of rhyme, the insertion or deletion of punctuation, and the adherence to a metrical pattern.

Some people consider poetry difficult to comprehend and compose by reason of its condensation of language, its rhythmic nature, its dense imagery, and its formalism.  Those are the inherent characteristics of poetry that set it apart from other literary genres.

In "Poetry: Diction, Imagery, Rhythm and Form" I focus on the importance of diction (word choice).  Poets choose words to create or extend figures of speech, for their sounds, to create or maintain rhythm, to create or extend images, and for formal reasons.

Poets use figurative language to achieve special meanings or effects.  Although they are primarily poetic, figures (tropes and schemes) are integral to the functioning of language and indispensable to all modes of discourse.

In contrast with other genres, poetry depends on sound to convey images and emotions.  One of your goals as a poet is to discover what sounds your words will make and what effect those sounds will have on the listener/reader.  Your diction will either contribute to or detract from the sonic texture of your poem.  Poetry is as much an oral tradition as it is a written tradition, and information in a poetic form that has regular rhyme and rhythm will be easier to remember and will aurally affect your audience.

One difference between poetry and music is melody.  The melodies that accompany the words enhance the sounds of the words and are essential in the creation of mood.  Poetry, however, solely depends on voice--that is, depends on the utterance of a sequence of speech-sounds.  How you utter the speech-sounds will determine the poem's meaning.  For example, consider the difference in meaning between the following statements.
     Why are you complaining?  I married you, didn't I?
     Why are you complaining?  I married you, didn't I?
Obviously, emphasizing different words can change the entire meaning of a poem.  As you create a poem, you need to use your ears.

Poets create music by way of rhyme, rhythm and form.  I will discuss form later, but at least consider the structure of the first two stanzas of Langston Hughes' "Young Gal's Blues."
     I'm gonna walk to the graveyard
     'Hind ma friend Miss Cora Lee.
     Gonna walk to the graveyard
     'Hind ma dear friend Cora Lee
     Cause when I'm dead some
     Body'll have to walk behind me.

     I'm goin' to the po' house
     To see ma old Aunt Clew.
     Goin' to the po' house
     To see ma old Aunt Clew.
     When I'm old an' ugly
     I'll want to see somebody, too.*
Although the blues began exclusively as a musical form, poets have been using the structure as a poetic form.  Melodies do not accompany Hughes' poem, but the content and form imply blues.  One can recite or sing his poem.  The first two lines of each stanza state the situation; the third and fourth lines repeat the situation; the last two lines either comment on the first two lines or conclude the first two lines.

How is it possible to create music simply from words?  Poets are sensitive to the words they hear, to the sounds words make.  The combination of consonants and vowels in certain ways--alliteration, consonance, assonance, repetition--can communicate emotions that are distinct from the words' denotations and/or connotations.  However, sound does not necessarily exist separate from meaning. Sometimes sound is equivalent to meaning.  Words that suggest their meanings via the sounds they make--chunk and sleazy, for examples--are mimetic, and words that imitate their meanings via the sounds they make--swish and zip, for examples--are onomatopoetic.  Too much alliteration, consonance, et cetera either will irritate or amuse your audience, so be aware of the effects your techniques will have on your audience.  In other words, try to infuse your techniques naturally into your poem in ways that do not bring undue attention to them.

Another element of sound poets utilize is rhyme, two or more words with the same sound.  Although end rhyme (at the end of lines) is the most well-known pattern, anaphora (at the beginning of lines) and internal rhyme (within a line or lines) are important techniques to consider when creating a poem.  A poet does not make a word rhyme for rhyme alone.  Rather, similar to other poetic devices, rhyme is a technique that a poet uses to create an effect, such as altering the tone of a poem.

Rather than true rhyme--wood and good, for example--you may want to experiment with eye rhyme--cough and though--or slant rhyme--body and bloody.  You also may want to experiment with punctuation.  End-stops (punctuation at the end of lines) cause the reader to pause and to stress the words at the end of such lines.  The technique can create a sing-song rhythm, a rhythm many nursery rhymes have.  Remember, you want to guide your audience to meaning not only through content but also through technique, so be certain of the rhetorical effect(s) you want to accomplish as you manipulate sound.

Punctuation marks--and lack of them--influence a poem's cadence, or pace.  A general rule is that the more punctuation, the slower your audience will read the poem.  Enjambment occurs where there is no punctuation at the end of a line or when the idea in one line continues in the next.  Because enjambment encourages a reader to move to the next line without pausing, using it will lessen a regular end-rhyme pattern or a sing-song effect.  Caesuras (punctuation within lines) cause a reader to pause or to stop in the middle of lines, slowing the pace of the poem or providing clear breaks in thought.

Rhythm is a result of cadence, of the natural pattern of sounds of words.  An analogy is that the rhythm or meter of a poem is similar to the drumbeat of a song.  Think also about instruments that establish sound and rhythm at the same time.  A rhythm guitarist creates sound with one hand as he/she fingers the chords and strokes the strings with the other hand in a rhythmical pattern, fast or slow, in time with the music.  In that way he/she creates sound and rhythm simultaneously, not separately.  When you write a poem, you create sound and rhythm simultaneously.  I introduced sound first because, if you are learning to play guitar, you need to study the configurations of chords before you experiment with strokes, until you are able to play a song as a whole.

Everyday conversation also has a cadence.  Some poets use the cadence of natural patterns of speech as the rhythm of their poetry.  Walt Whitman, the originator of free verse in the United States, utilized such patterns in his poems.  Poets who write in free verse do not use strict metrical patterns to determine units of measure.  One way they measure rhythm is through lines and stanzas.  They unify the ideas they present by employing a wide range of figures of speech.

Some forms of poetry, however, have a specific rhythmic pattern.  Contemporary verse is accentual-syllabic because the metrical units contain a set number of accents (stresses) as well as a set number of syllables in each line.  When you examine a poem for meter, mark the accented and unaccented syllables and words, looking for patterns and breaks in those patterns.  That process is scansion.  You want to train your ear just as a musician trains his/her ear.  After you sensitize yourself to rhythm and meter, you will become more adept, and you will be able to analyze your poems better.

The basic unit of measure is the foot: iamb, trochee, anapest, dactyl and spondee.  A line of two feet is dimeter; three feet, trimeter; four feet, tetrameter; five feet, pentameter; six feet, hexameter; seven feet, heptameter; and eight feet, octameter.  Scansion is an inexact science, and different scholars have different methods of scanning a poem.  Your scan of a poem may differ from another reader's scan.  Scansion is a tool for measuring rhythm and cadence, not an end to itself.  Another step you may want to complete is to read the poem for meaning, perhaps underlining or bracketing the words you naturally stress.  Actors do such as they read a script because emphasizing different words can change the entire meaning of a work.

Deviations from the prevalent meter call attention to themselves and alter the pace at which the poem is read, either quickening or slowing the metrical pattern.  For example, the more accented syllables, in or out of sequence, a poem has, the slower the reader will proceed.  As you explore rhythm in your poetry, you may want to consider music as a resource.  Although many songs you hear utilize regular rhythms, many poets use blues and jazz rhythms as patterns for poems.  Jazz and poetry have many similarities, but different rules govern each.

(For more information on the aforementioned techniques, you may want to peruse this post.)
_______________________________________________________
     *Arnold Rampersad and David Roessel, eds., The Collected Poems of Langston Hughes (New York: Knopf, 1996) 123.       

Friday, May 21, 2010

Deconstruction: Robert Lowell's "For the Union Dead"

The following interpretation of Robert Lowell's "For the Union Dead" is via deconstruction.

1.   Read the poem aloud.

2.   Scan the poem, using a dictionary.

      Line 1: u / / / u u / u u / (enjambment) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
      Line 4: u / u / u / (end-stop) = 6 syllables with 3 stresses
      Line 7: u / u / u (enjambment) = 5 syllables with 2 stresses
      Line 10: u u / / u u / u / u / u (enjambment) = 13 syllables with 5 stresses
      Line 13: / u u / u / u u / u / (end-stop) = 11 syllables with 5 stresses
      Line 16: u / u / u / u / (end-stop) = 8 syllables with 4 stresses
      Line 35: u / u / u / u (end-stop) = 7 syllables with 3 stresses
      Line 40: u / u / u / or u / / u u / (end-stop) = 6 syllables with 3 stresses
      Line 45: u / / u u u / / / u / u (enjambment) = 12 syllables with 6 stresses
      Line 50: u / u / (end-stop) = 4 syllables with 2 stresses
      Line 55: u / u / u u / u / u / (enjambment) = 11 syllables with 5 stresses
      Line 60: u / / u u / u / / u / u u / (end-stop) = 14 syllables with 7 stresses
      Line 65: u u / u u u / / u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 4 stresses
      Line 68: / / u / (end-stop) = 4 syllables with 3 stresses 

      Dominant foot: iamb
      Number of feet per line: variable
      Form: quatrains (unrhymed)

3.   Determine the poetic techniques Lowell employs, and use a dictionary
      to determine the meanings of unfamiliar words.      

      Line 1: diction = "South Boston" (setting)
      Lines 1-2: dislocation = "Boston" and "Sahara"
                         oxymorons = "Aquarium" and "Sahara" and "snow"
      Line 2: metaphor = "Sahara of snow" (bleakness)
                   alliteration = "Sahara" and "snow" + "broken" and "boarded" and
                   "bronze" (line 3)
      Line 3: imagery = appeals to sense of sight ("bronze") and touch
                   ("scales")
      Line 4: extension of metaphor = "airy" and "dry"
      Line 5: personification = "nose crawled"
                   simile = "like a snail"
      Lines 6-7: synecdoche = "my hand tingled / to burst the bubbles" (He, as
                         a whole, wants to pop the air bubbles.)
      Line 7: alliteration = "burst the bubbles"
      Line 8: irony = "noses" (Fish breathe through gills.)
                   irony = "cowed" (Speaker means "coward.")
                   Cow means to frighten with threats or force.
                   alliteration = "cowed" and "compliant"
      Line 9: metaphor = "My hand draws back."  (Literally he stops writing,
                   but figuratively he is reflecting, and with respect to the figurative 
                   meaning, it is an example of synecdoche.)
                   pun = "still" ("sighs" to silence, without movement, or up to the 
                   time suggested)
      Lines 10-11: allusion to Theodore Roethke who wrote much about the 
                             regression of humanity to its primal state
      Line12: imagery = appeals to sense of touch ("barbed") and sight 
                    ("galvanized") That is in reverse order with respect to line 3.
      Line 13: assonance = "Boston Common"
                      metaphor = "cage" (a fence)
      Line 14: metaphor = "dinosaur" (gigantic and outmoded)
                      personification = "grunting"
      Line 15: personification = "cropped up"
      Line 16: metaphor = "underworld garage" (hell, for they are in a "cage" 
                      [line 13])
      Line 17: personification = "luxuriate"
      Lines 17-18: simile = "like civic / sandpiles" = metaphor (playgrounds
                             or parks)
      Line 18: dead metaphor = "heart of Boston" (downtown)
      Line 19: cacophony
                      alliteration = "girdle" and "girders" + "Puritan-pumpkin"
                      oxymoron = "Puritan-pumpkin" (Puritans were English  
                      Protestants, and we associate pumpkins with Halloween, a
                      secular celebration.)
      Line 20: personification = "tingling"
      Line 21: personification = "shaking" and "faces"
      Line 22: cacophony
      Line 23: wordplay = "shaking" (repetition)
      Line 24: cacophony (reflects "earthquake")
      Lines 25-26: historical reference
      Line 28: allusion = "William James," the American psychologist and 
                      philosopher, was a founder of pragmatism and the
                      psychological movement of functionalism.
                      litotes = "could almost hear" (James was dead at the time of
                      the dedication.)
                      alliteration = "bronze" and "breathe"
      Line 29: simile = "like a fishbone"
      Lines 29-30: metaphor = hard for the city to swallow (accept) Shaw's 
                            idealism
      Line 30: personification = "city's throat" = metaphor (internalization)
      Lines 31-32: alliteration = "Colonel" and "compass-needle"
                             simile = "as lean / as a compass-needle"
      Line 33: simile = "wrenlike"
      Line 34: analogy = the Colonel has "a greyhound's gentle tautness"
      Line 35: personification = "wince"
      Line 36: personification = "suffocate"
      Line 37: pun/irony = "He is out of bounds" (Shaw is, of course, a part of 
                     the monument, but he is no longer under moral obligation.)
                     irony = "now" (temporal dislocation = contemporary [lines 
                     37-38] and historical [lines 39-40] references)
                     personification = "rejoices"
      Line 38: alliteration = "peculiar power"
                      oxymoron = "to choose life and die"
      Line 39: wordplay = "black" and "death"
      Line 40: metaphor = "he cannot bend his back" (moves forward with 
                      rectitude [refer to line 37])
                      internal rhyme = "black" (line 39) and "back"
      Lines 41-42: imagery = appeal to sense of sight: "greens" and "white"
      Lines 42-43: dead metaphor = "air / of ... rebellion" (The people in New
                              England have a rebellious attitude.)
      Line 43: metaphor = "sparse, sincere rebellion" (They are against
                      European tradition.)
                      alliteration = "frayed flags"
      Lines 43-44: irony = "frayed flags / quilt the graveyards of the Grand
                             Army of the Republic" (The army is not large, noble in 
                             appearance, or of high rank.)
      Line 44: alliteration = "graveyards" and "Grand"
      Line 45: alliteration = "stone statues"
                      ambiguity = "abstract" (why?)
      Line 46: personification = "grow"
                      oxymoron = "grow slimmer"
                      metaphor = idealism of Shaw and his army is fading
      Line 47: alliteration = "wasp-wasted"
                      personification = "doze"
      Line 48: personification = "muse"
                      metonymy and synecdoche = "muse through their sideburns" 
                      (head)
      Line 50: metonymy = "ditch" (his son)
      Line 53: temporal dislocation
                      metaphor = "The ditch is nearer." (site of excavation)
      Line 54: metaphor = "the last war" (WWII, not an idealistic war)
      Line 56: metaphor = "Hiroshima boiling" (atomic bomb)
      Line 57: allusion = "Rock of Ages" (Christianity)
      Line 58: metaphor = "Space" (heaven)
      Line 59: wordplay = "crouch" (speaker moves downward)
      Line 60: wordplay = "faces ... rise"
                      oxymoron = "drained" and "balloons"
                      simile = "like balloons"
      Line 61: proper noun in isolation (refer to lines 37 and 64)
      Line 62: pun = "bubble" (a pocket of air in a solid and an illusion)
      Line 63: personification = "waits"
      Line 64: pun = "break" (physical separation and succumbing spiritually)
      Line 66: alliteration = "finned" and "forward" and "fish"
                      simile = "like fish"
      Line 67: oxymoron = "savage servility" (wild or barbaric submissiveness 
                      or servitude)
      Lines 67-68: alliteration = "savage servility / slides" 

4.   Summarize and interpret the poem via deconstructive criticism. 

      The title of the poem indicates it is for the Union's dead,
      suggesting the work honors the soldiers who died in the
      American Civil War.  However, by 1960, every soldier who had
      fought in the Civil War was dead.  After initially reading the
      poem, a reader may interpret it as speaking for the soldiers, as
      voicing their possible disgust at the loss of the aquarium, at the
      construction, and at the grease.  One may also interpret the title
      as meaning, "for the Union, which is now dead."  That
      multiplicity of meanings is, of course, a feature of deconstructive
      analysis. 

      One point to consider as you interpret the poem is how much the
      speaker devotes his stream of consciousness to the Civil War, in
      general, and to the soldiers, in particular.  Although the speaker
      focuses on Shaw, he only mentions his regiment.  Is the poem
      actually in honor of the soldiers who died in the Civil War?  The
      speaker celebrates the involvement of the Union's "black
      soldiers" (39), but the poem is more about the speaker, who is
      mourning the present attitude of Bostonians. 

      The poem was composed for and read at the Boston Arts
      Festival in June 1960.  It begins in the present, "now" (2), in
      which the "South Boston Aquarium stands / in a Sahara of
      snow" (1-2).  It ends with the "giant finned cars" (66) moving
      "forward like fish" (66) with a "savage servility" (67) that "slides
      by on grease" (68).  It seems that the poem's true subject appears
      in lines 59 and 60, in which the speaker says, "When I crouch to
      my television set, / the drained faces of Negro school-children
      rise like balloons."  That image echoes the earlier images in lines
      five through eight, when the speaker remembers himself viewing
      "the cowed, compliant fish" (8).  He then reveals, "I often sigh
      still / for the dark downward and vegetating kingdom / of the
      fish and reptile" (9-11).  Considering the poem is supposedly
      honoring the Union's dead, the description of the aquarium is a
      strange place to begin.  (Notice the "monument sticks like a
      fishbone / in the city's throat" [28-30].) 

      The connection between the "dark" (10) piscine and African
      American worlds may seem strange, but for the speaker, the loss
      of the aquarium, the monument, and the current ugliness of
      Boston are all relative.  The television (society in a figurative
      sense) traps the "Negro school-children" (60).  They are similar
      to the fish and reptiles in the aquarium.  Although the Civil War
      is over, who is free?  We have only a "savage servility" (67).

Saturday, May 15, 2010

New Criticism: Theodore Roethke's "My Papa's Waltz"

The following interpretation of Theodore Roethke's "My Papa's Waltz" is via New Criticism.

1.   Read the poem aloud.

2.   Scan the poem, using a dictionary.

      Line 1: u / u u / / (enjambment) = six syllables with three stresses
      Line 2: u / u / / / u (end-stop) = seven syllables with four stresses
      Line 3: u u / u / / (end-stop) = six syllables with three stresses
      Line 4: u / u u / / u (end-stop) = seven syllables with three stresses

      Line 5: u / u / u / (enjambment) = six syllables with three stresses
      Line 6: / u u / u / (end-stop) = six syllables with three stresses
      Line 7: u / u / u u (enjambment) = six syllables with two stresses
      Line 8: u / u / u / (end-stop) = six syllables with three stresses

      Line 9: u / u / u / (enjambment) = six syllables with three stresses
      Line 10: u / u u / / u (end-stop) = seven syllables with three stresses
      Line 11: u / u / u / (enjambment) = six syllables with three stresses
      Line 12: u / / / u / u (end-stop) = seven syllables with four stresses 

      Line 13: u / / u u / (enjambment) = six syllables with three stresses
      Line 14: u u / / / u / (end-stop) = seven syllables with four stresses
      Line 15: u / u / u / (enjambment) = six syllables with three stresses
      Line 16: / / u / u / (end-stop) = six syllables with four stresses 

      Dominant foot: iamb
      Number of feet per line: three
      Prevailing meter (dominant foot + number of feet per line):
      iambic trimeter
      Primary variation on dominant foot: anapest then spondee
      Structure: quatrain
      Rhyme scheme: abab (imperfect, partial, near or slant rhyme)
      // cdc (imperfect) d // efef // ghgh 

3.   Determine the poetic techniques Roethke employs, and use a
      dictionary to determine the meanings of unfamiliar words.      

      Line1: diction = "whiskey" (suggests drunkenness)
      Line 2: diction = "small boy" (speaker is male)
      Line 3: diction = "hung" (past tense of "hang" so speaker is a
                   son reflecting on his childhood)
                   simile = "like death" (negative connotation)
      Line 4: metaphor = "waltzing" (the dance of life)
      Line 5: diction = "romped" (positive denotation = "to play or
                   frolic boisterously)
                   structural irony = meter is iambic trimeter
      Line 6: cacophony = "slid," "kitchen" and "shelf"
      Lines 7-8: alliteration = "countenance" and "could"
      Line 8: synecdoche = her "countenance / Could not unfrown
                   itself" (Her entire appearance signifies her face.)
      Line 9: alliteration = "hand" and "held"
      Line 10: diction = "battered" (connotes abuse = negative)
      Line 11: structural irony = meter is iambic trimeter
      Line 12: cacophony = "scraped" and "buckle" + extra stress
      Line 13: diction = "beat" (connotes abuse = negative)
                     metaphor = "beat time on my head"
                     (metronome = "a device used to mark time by means of
                     regularly recurring ticks or flashes at adjustable intervals")
      Line 14: cacophony = extra stress
      Line 15: euphony = meter is iambic trimeter
      Line 16: ambiguity = "clinging" (to escape death [line 3] or he
                     did not want to stop romping [line 5]?) 

4.   What is the significance of the poem's structure?  (Remember,
      New Critics do not use the term form because of its historical
      connotations.)  Your answer will affect your interpretation of the
      poem.  (Remember, do not separate the overall structure from
      the verbal meanings.)

      A waltz is a ballroom dance in triple time.  The prevailing meter
      mimics the rhythm of the dance.  Furthermore, the alternate
      rhymes metaphorically represent the two dancers and the two
      moods. 

5.   Summarize and interpret the poem via New Criticism. 

      The son, reflecting on his childhood, is the speaker.  His tone is
      crucial to the reader's interpretation of the poem.  With respect
      to "romped" (line 5) and "waltzed" (line 15), the event seems
      high-spirited.  However, the "whiskey" (line 1), "the pans" (line
      5), the mother's appearance (line 7), the "knuckle" (line 10), the
      "buckle" (line 12), and the metronome (line 13) all seem
      low-spirited.  The most significant negative connotations
      concern the son hanging on "like death" (line 3) and "clinging"
      (line 16) to his father's shirt.  The mother was frowning, but we
      do not know what her outlook was.  The son might have been
      grasping affectionately.

      Whether you choose to interpret the memory as an instance of
      affection or an instance of abuse simplifies the poem.  It is not
      an either/or situation.  One may unify the oppositions in two
      ways.  First, although the father's roughness may be
      troublesome, the son treasures his affection, clinging to his
      memory as he clung to his father's shirt.  Second, although the
      father was attentive and affectionate, his disregard for his son's
      safety and his wife's disapproval are troublesome.  But as New
      Critics we need to unite those two interpretations: the poem is an
      expression of the son's ambivalence (oppositional attitudes)
      toward his father. 

Wednesday, May 12, 2010

Reader-Response Criticism: Robinson Jeffers' "Carmel Point"

The following interpretation of Robinson Jeffers"Carmel Point" is via reader-response criticism.

1.   Read the poem aloud.  What are your initial reactions? 

2.   Scan the poem, using a dictionary. 

      Line 1: u u / u / u / u u / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 4 stresses
      Line 2: u / u u / u / u u / u u / u / u (end-stop) = 16 syllables with
                   6 stresses
      Line 3: u / u u / u / u / / (end-stop) = 10 syllables with 5 stresses
      Line 4: u / u / u / u u / u / u / / (end-stop) = 14 syllables with 7
                   stresses
      Line 5: end-stop
      Line 6: end-stop
      Line 7: end-stop
      Line 8: u / u / u u / / / u / u u u / (enjambment) = 5 syllables with
                   7 stresses
                   or
                   u / u / u / / / / u / u u u / (enjambment) = 15 syllables with
                   8 stresses
      Line 9: enjambment
      Line 10: enjambment
      Line 11: end-stop
      Line 12: end-stop
      Line 13: end-stop
      Line 14: u / u / u / u / u / u u u / / u u (enjambment) = 17
                     syllables with 7 stresses
      Line 15: u u / u / u / u u / / (end-stop) = 11 syllables with 5
                     stresses 

      Prevailing meter: irregular, but iamb is dominant foot
      Primary variation on dominant foot: anapest
      Form: free verse 

3.   Determine the poetic techniques Jeffers employs, and use a
      dictionary to determine the meanings of unfamiliar words.      

      Line 1: pathetic fallacy = objects ("things") are patient
      Line 2: assonance = "place" and "defaced"
                   wordplay = "crop" (meaning "cultivated plants or
                   agricultural produce" and/or "a group, quantity or supply
                   appearing at one time")  "Crop" complicates the idea that
                   the suburban houses are defacing Carmel Point because a
                   crop is the result of cultivation, a process in which
                   humans and nature work together.  Furthermore, the
                   houses are no more durable than a crop of tomatoes or
                   artichokes.  The word also suggests that cultivation
                   momentarily defaces the landscape.
      Line 3: ambiguity = "it" ("It" is not a former beauty that has
                   been ruined by humans.)
      Line 4: Poppies are perennial plants with mostly single flowers
                   that have black centers.  They bloom for short periods in
                   early summer.
                   Lupines are perennial plants with tall spikes of pealike
                   flowers that bloom in middle to late spring above deeply
                   divided leaves.
                   wordplay = "walled" (nature is containing itself)
                   alliteration = "clean" and "cliffs"
      Line 5: "intrusion" refers to "walled" in previous line = horses
                   are a part of nature
      Line 6: "milch cows" provide milk
                   repetition of "crop" in "outcrop"
      Line 7: ambiguity = "spoiler has come" (referring to the "crop of
                   suburban houses" or to what follows the colon?)  The
                   present perfect tense, formed with the auxiliary have or
                   has and a verb's past participle, indicates an action that,
                   although begun at some past time, continues to have an
                   impact in the present.
                   pathetic fallacy = "it" (nature) does or does not "care"
      Line 8: metaphor = "people are a tide" (humanity is an ocean)
      Line 9: metaphor = "swells and in time will ebb" (population
                   growth and decline)
      Line 10: "Their works dissolve" = The speaker is shifting our
                     perspective to a different vantage point, moving us
                     beyond a merely human perspective and inviting us to
                     look at "their" houses from the outside.
      Line 11: metaphor = "grain of granite" (stands for the enduring
                     essence of nature)  What we see at Carmel Point is a
                     passing image, an illusion.  What we see in the granite is
                     an image of "pristine beauty" (line 10) that will return
                     after the human settlement is gone.  It is "pristine"
                     because humans cannot spoil it.
                     alliteration = "grain" and "granite"
      Line 12: "endless ocean" = The speaker's assertion that the
                     ocean is "endless" may not be accurate technically, for
                     the ocean and even the solar system will end someday,
                     but from a strictly human perspective, the oceans are
                     "endless" with respect to time (as are the perennial
                     plants in line 4).
                     personification = the "ocean ... climbs our cliff"
                     alliteration = "climbs" and "cliff"
      Line 13: In order to "uncenter our minds," we must first
                     disengage ourselves from our strictly human perspective
                     (line 10).
      Line 14: anaphora = "We must"
                     In order to "unhumanize our views," we must first
                     disengage ourselves from our strictly human perspective
                     (lines 10 and 13).
      Lines 14-15: pathetic fallacy = "the rock and ocean" are "confident" 

4.   Summarize and interpret the poem via reader-response criticism.

      Robinson Jeffers wanted us to experience the poem as the
      speaker experiences nature: hence the volta ("turn") at line
      eight.  Initially I thought the third line refers to a formerly
      beautiful landscape that has been ruined by humans, which led
      me to decide that humanity's deeds and misdeeds are important
      to the speaker.  But as I analyzed the poem, I discovered that
      humans are not significant.  The speaker's view of nature is
      much larger: "It has all time" (8).  All humanity's works,
      including the "suburban houses" that deface Carmel Point, will
      "dissolve" (2 and 10, respectively).  Does that suggest humans
      can spoil nature however we wish because our effects will not
      last?  Yes, one may draw that conclusion.  If a reader responds
      to the poem in that way, then our effects will not matter, for "the
      image of the pristine beauty / Lives in the very grain of the
      granite, / Safe as the endless ocean that climbs our cliff"
      (10-12).  However, and this is the primary reason I like the
      poem, an inescapable conclusion is also that humanity must be
      more humble.  Nature is powerful and deserves our awe.  Thus,
      we must "uncenter our minds from ourselves" and "unhumanize
      our views a little" (13 and 14, respectively).  Those actions,
      according to the speaker, will transform the way we experience
      Carmel Point.

      The poem evokes a response that is deeply and powerfully
      environmental.  Humans are simply a small part of nature.
      Ultimately it does not matter what we do because we will not be
      here forever.  I think Jeffers hoped such insight would alter the
      way we live during our time on Earth.  Because decentering
      involves a loss of self and dehumanizing further displaces an
      individual within humanity--which, again, is part of something
      larger--the reader, according to the speaker, should strive for a
      humility that is spiritual.

5.   Use outside sources of information if you feel you have not
      achieved a valid interpretation.

      Robinson Jeffers' poetry exhibits influences of Friedrich
      Nietzsche and Ralph Waldo Emerson's philosophies.  Jeffers
      agreed with Nietzsche that poetry must reclaim substance and
      sense, must contain physical and psychological realities--the
      reasons scientific and philosophic ideas are in his poetry.  Jeffers
      also agreed with Emerson's concept of reality--powerful enough
      to prevent possession of it--concept of beauty--greater than
      intellect--and concept of nature--a combination of power, reality
      and beauty.  Jeffers was not a humanist.  He believed humanity's
      existence will be short and will end tragically.  His primary
      concern was nature as a beautiful necessity.  He wanted his
      readers' souls to learn to love something that is not personal and
      not human.  Although there are religious undertones in his
      poetry, they are not Christian; rather, they are naturalistic, for
      God is equivalent to physical forces.

For more information on Robinson Jeffers, read Roy Harvey Pearce's The Continuity of American Poetry (1987), Hyatt Waggoner's American Poets (1984), or David Perkins' A History of Modern Poetry (1987).